After having fixed the typo, regtesting went without regression. Dominique
> Le 19 avr. 2015 à 20:35, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hello! > > Attached patch removes reload_in_progress checks for x86 (LRA enabled) > target. AFAICS, reload_in_progress is never set during the > compilation, a watchpoint on this variable didn't trigger for a couple > of complex compilations. > > 2015-04-19 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> > > * config/i386/i386.c (set_pic_reg_ever_live): Remove. > (legitimize_pic_address): Do not call set_pic_reg_ever_live. > (legitimize_tls_address): Ditto. > (ix86_expand_move): Ditto. > (ix86_expand_binary_operator): Remove reload_in_progress checks. > (ix86_expand_unary_operator): Ditto. > * config/i386/predicates.md (index_register_operand): Ditto. > > Patch was bootstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression tested for > x86_64-linux-gnu, i686-linux-gnu with and w/o -fpic. > > The patch also changes Darwin specific code that can't be tested > properly on linux. Instead of leaving a reload_in_progress_check > theere, I'd ask someone to bootstrap and regression test the patch on > Darwin target. > > I'll wait for the Darwin regression test results (and possible > comments) before committing the patch. > > Uros. > <p.diff.txt>
