With the patch bootstrapping x86_64-apple-darwin14 was broken due to a typo:
../../work/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function 'void
ix86_expand_move(machine_mode, rtx_def**)':
../../work/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:17296:32: error: expected ',' or ';' before
')' token
? op0 : gen_reg_rtx (Pmode));
^
After removing the extra right parenthesis, I am now at stage 2.
Dominique
> Le 19 avr. 2015 à 20:35, Uros Bizjak <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hello!
>
> Attached patch removes reload_in_progress checks for x86 (LRA enabled)
> target. AFAICS, reload_in_progress is never set during the
> compilation, a watchpoint on this variable didn't trigger for a couple
> of complex compilations.
>
> 2015-04-19 Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
>
> * config/i386/i386.c (set_pic_reg_ever_live): Remove.
> (legitimize_pic_address): Do not call set_pic_reg_ever_live.
> (legitimize_tls_address): Ditto.
> (ix86_expand_move): Ditto.
> (ix86_expand_binary_operator): Remove reload_in_progress checks.
> (ix86_expand_unary_operator): Ditto.
> * config/i386/predicates.md (index_register_operand): Ditto.
>
> Patch was bootstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression tested for
> x86_64-linux-gnu, i686-linux-gnu with and w/o -fpic.
>
> The patch also changes Darwin specific code that can't be tested
> properly on linux. Instead of leaving a reload_in_progress_check
> theere, I'd ask someone to bootstrap and regression test the patch on
> Darwin target.
>
> I'll wait for the Darwin regression test results (and possible
> comments) before committing the patch.
>
> Uros.
> <p.diff.txt>
