Le jeu. 15 oct. 26 à 11:16:52 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> écrivait :
> > Hi, Hello, > > im not a fan of electron either and am not surprised that a version of > > it is not supported but i have to agree with Miroslav that it makes it a > > bit of a pain to use freebsd as a desktop > > Yes, signal-desktop builds fine and the build of Signal itself is fast. But > the electron takes huge amount of time. If you heave a powerful machine, you > can just update ports tree and build signal-desktop. > It's sad that instead of building Electron once for thousands of users, > thousands of users have to build it themselves. It's a needless waste of > electricity. There is a PR about this problem, opened 3 years ago: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270565 And we have the same problem with chromium and its cousins (iridium, etc.). The problem seems to be financial in nature: the compilation farm needs more beefy computers to build these packages! -- Th. Thomas.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
