Op zo 20 mei 2012 15:39:37 schreef Michael Scheidell: > On 5/20/12 3:34 PM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > > I think you don't want 1.0.0.b, since the .b will signify a beta and > > 1.0.0> 1.0.0.b. That doesn't look like how upstream means it to be. > > better than 1.0.0b. > because, 1.0.1 will be > 1.0.0.b
But at some point upstream could release 1.0.1a and 1.0.1b > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile > > -naming.html#AEN752 > not all that clear, is it? Agreed, hence the link to the PR where I describe some tests I did with PORTVERSION > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165767#reply6 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
