On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in why
> '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'?
Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things like version
numbers and rc scripts, so people get a more consistent experience,
rather than bowing to the particular upstream/maintainer's view of how
versions work.
so, we need to update committers/porters handbook, or is this some
secret thing? another of those 'we won't document it, but we sure as
hell will publically lart you if you disobay the unspoken, undocumented
secred code ?'
or, like I asked 'I need to give a link to submitter to show him this is
the best way to do it'.
I guess I wait till the email archive is finished and point him to
chris's post?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
