On 5/20/12 10:36 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 20/05/2012 14:41, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I seem to remember some discussion on using numeric only, and not alpha
in PORTVERSION string, and would like to address this with maintainer
unless its just my faulty memory mixing up PORTVERSION/REVISION.
only thing I found ~seems~ to indicate using alpha is ok:
<http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN504>
portlint -abt doesn't complain, but it is a 'new port' and I don't want
it to start out life with something that will garner larts,pavmail or
other wise generate public flogging once I commit it.
Try setting DISTVERSION=1.0.0b and let the ports generate PORTVERSION
make -V PORTVERSION
1.0.0.b
ok, like that?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
