Op zo 20 mei 2012 15:28:40 schreef Michael Scheidell: > On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > >> any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in > >> why > >> > >> > '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? > > > > Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things like version > > numbers and rc scripts, so people get a more consistent experience, > > rather than bowing to the particular upstream/maintainer's view of how > > versions work. > > so, we need to update committers/porters handbook, or is this some > secret thing? another of those 'we won't document it, but we sure as > hell will publically lart you if you disobay the unspoken, undocumented > secred code ?' > > or, like I asked 'I need to give a link to submitter to show him this is > the best way to do it'. > > I guess I wait till the email archive is finished and point him to > chris's post? >
I think you don't want 1.0.0.b, since the .b will signify a beta and 1.0.0 > 1.0.0.b. That doesn't look like how upstream means it to be. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN752 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165767#reply6 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
