The removing the remjet (the backing you speak of) has been greatly exaggerated in terms of how hard it is. I use a warm baking soda bath and a quick wipe down with a damp microfiber cloth. Not a speck remains. Theres some great tutorials on YouTube to employ a variety of removal methods, if anyone is interested.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:07 AM trevor adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Mr. Antos is correct, sir. It's less than half the going rate of > reversal. Also, this particular stock doesn't have the backing which makes > hand-processing arduous (as it's been explained to me). And ignorance is > about the most cultivated quality in my work! > Trevor Adams > sinemodafatestare.com > > Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > > ------------------------------ > *From:* FrameWorks <[email protected]> on behalf of > Julian Antos <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 12:14 AM > *To:* Experimental Film Discussion List > *Subject:* Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? > > I think the appeal is that it’s much cheaper! > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Francisco Torres <[email protected]> > wrote: > > pardon my ignorance but I have never understood the use of print stock > as camera original. Would using reversal accomplish similar results? > > 2019-03-20 12:20 GMT-04:00, MONO NO AWARE <[email protected]>: > > https://vimeo.com/290301242 > > > > Results from our workshop. A few water marks, but for their first time > in > > the lab processing, to be cross processing and have these results its > > pretty good, could have used a darker orange filter, but it was overcast > > and we couldn't forfeit the light. > > > > > > ◅ > > *MONO NO AWARE* > > 501c3 Cinema Arts Non-Profit Organization est. 2007 > > | Film Stock | Equipment | Lab Facilities | Workshops | > > a: 33 Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn New York > > < > https://www.google.com/maps/dir//33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217/@40.6877184,-73.9819882,17z/data=!4m17!1m7!3m6!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2s33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217!3b1!8m2!3d40.6877184!4d-73.9797995!4m8!1m0!1m5!1m1!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2m2!1d-73.9797995!2d40.6877184!3e2 > > > > e: mononoawarefilm.com c: +1 2674561143 <%2B1%20267%20456-1143> in:gram > > <https://www.instagram.com/mononoawarefilm/> > > <%2B1%20267%20456-1143> > > press: New York Times > > < > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/nyregion/a-brooklyn-film-school-where-the-digital-revolution-didnt-happen.html > >, > > ViceTV > > < > https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/the-brooklyn-film-organization-bringing-analog-back-to-the-masses/584f0f243d8095724ccdaf1e > >, > > The Brooklyn Rail > > <https://brooklynrail.org/2018/11/film/Mixed-Use-MONO-NO-AWARE> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:13 PM Anna Kipervaser > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I am often shooting on 3383; I use an 85 filter (orange to compensate > for > >> lack of orange base in the stock and to get near true color) and rate > >> 3383 > >> at 3. Then I process in Tetenal E6 in a lomo reel/tank. Recipe below. > >> > >> FD: 100 degrees F, 2:45min > >> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F > >> CD: 100 degrees F, 6min > >> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F > >> BLIX: 100 degrees F, 6min > >> H2O: 10min, cool. > >> Stabilizer out of tank: 30sec > >> Shake reel > >> Hang film to dry > >> > >> Also, Mono No Aware has had successful results with C41. > >> > >> Always, > >> Anna > >> > >> > >> > >> --- > >> anna kipervaser > >> 847.571.6943 > >> > >> annakipervaser.com > >> yellowfilmlab.com > >> onlookfilms.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:03 AM <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> You can reach the person managing the list at > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >>> than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..." > >>> Today's Topics: > >>> > >>> 1. Re: Barbara Hammer, RIP (Dominic Angerame) > >>> 2. tips for shooting on print stock? (trevor adams) > >>> 3. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Scott Dorsey) > >>> 4. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Nicole Baker) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: Dominic Angerame <[email protected]> > >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: > >>> Bcc: > >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:23:19 -0400 > >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Barbara Hammer, RIP > >>> I am so sorry to hear this. I worked with Barbara for many years while > >>> at > >>> Canyon Cinema and always admired her courage, strength and commitment > to > >>> avant- cinema and women filmmakers around the world. > >>> > >>> Her dynamic energy is certainly a loss to the community. > >>> > >>> Dominic Angerame > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 10:54 PM, Ruth Hayes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I just want to acknowledge Barbara Hammer’s passing, her influence on > so > >>> many experimental filmmakers, including myself, and her courage, > >>> playfulness and indomitable spirit. > >>> > >>> Peace, > >>> > >>> Ruth Hayes > >>> > >>> http://www.randommotion.com > >>> > >>> blogs.evergreen.edu/hayesr > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FrameWorks mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: trevor adams <[email protected]> > >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: > >>> Bcc: > >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:20:12 +0000 > >>> Subject: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? > >>> Hiya one'n all, > >>> > >>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print > >>> stock, with a bolex. Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, > I'm > >>> not sure if i should even take light readings? Anything would be > >>> helpful... > >>> Thanks, > >>> Trevor Adams > >>> > >>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Cc: > >>> Bcc: > >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:25:49 -0400 > >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? > >>> 5 seems optimistic. Shoot a test. > >>> --scott > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: Nicole Baker <[email protected]> > >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: > >>> Bcc: > >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:12:57 -0700 > >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? > >>> I haven't tried print stock, but have played with film I made myself > >>> (handmade emulsion applied to clear leader) and that is also rated at a > >>> 5 > >>> (if that). I would still absolutely take light readings, especially if > >>> you're pointing at the light source, you might be surprised how much > >>> light > >>> it throws off. Maybe try spot metering instead of ambient. I find > that > >>> helps me "see" the scene the way the film might. > >>> Post your results! I'd love to see them. > >>> > >>> Nicole Elaine Baker > >>> MFA in Visual Studies, 2019 > >>> Pacific Northwest College of Art > >>> Hallie Ford School of Graduate Studies > >>> *www.magiklantern.com <http://www.magiklantern.com>* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:20 AM trevor adams <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hiya one'n all, > >>>> > >>>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print > >>>> stock, with a bolex. Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, > >>>> I'm > >>>> not sure if i should even take light readings? Anything would be > >>>> helpful... > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Trevor Adams > >>>> > >>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> FrameWorks mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FrameWorks mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FrameWorks mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > -- > Julian Antos > Chicago Film Society > www.chicagofilmsociety.org <http://www.northwestchicagofilmsociety.org/> > 773 827 8991 <(773)%20827-8991> > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
