Well, the majority of g_* are wrapped with macros anyway, so it wouldn't be a major issue.
Would the developers of Fluidsynth be OK if I sent a series of patches to this list that slowly eliminated the need for glib? Unless you have another way of handling contributions or something.... On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kjetil Matheussen <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Ryan Gonzalez <rym...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Similar things for the rest of them. This doesn't seem TOO bad... >> >> > Maybe it would be a good idea to just implement the necessary > "g_"* functions for the needed platforms instead of creating a new API > doing all of these things? > > > _______________________________________________ > fluid-dev mailing list > fluid-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev > > -- Ryan [ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong. http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
_______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
