On January 13, 2016 11:33:20 AM CST, Chris Robinson <chris.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 01/13/2016 08:47 AM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote: >> glib isn't actually that huge, and Fluidsynth puts it to good use. >> Cross-platform threading is hard. I'm writing an application that >> depends on Fluidsynth, and it wasn't really a program. > >It's not too difficult to wrap up pthreads and Win32 threads into a >common API. C11 also includes a threading API. > >The problem with glib is that it's a big pain for me to use on Windows. > >At least, last I looked there was no prebuilt libs and headers that I >could drop into my (cross-)compiler, and building it required building >a >number of dependencies that were difficult to get set up. Things I'd >need to do for both 32-bit and 64-bit targets. And when I do, it leaves > >me with more DLLs to keep track of. >
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/ The binaries are a bit old, but they work with Fluidsynth. http://sourceforge.net/p/fluidsynth/wiki/BuildingWithCMake/#building-on-windows says which ones exactly you need, though I was able to skip the dsound.h part. >I really like using FluidSynth in my projects, on Linux, but the >problems with glib on Windows has been a big barrier to me using and >recommending it more broadly. Even if I get it working, it will be just > >as big of a problem for anyone else that wants to build my projects on >Windows. > >_______________________________________________ >fluid-dev mailing list >fluid-dev@nongnu.org >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev -- Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
