Am Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:53:50 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> > 4. What is the status of the C++ binding? Isn't recommended to use > > the ELF C API inside a C++ application, is it? > > i'd generally say using the c api is the best way to use efl. of > course it works inside c++. it just has a c api. that's all. c++ > bindings give you a c+ +-like "oo" api to efl, but be aware they they > will sometimes be incomplete and not support some features the c api > has. I'm developing the C++ API (EFLxx). It's like raster said. It's really usable for most EFL libraries. I use them everyday since some years, but the API is still not frozen and not all functions are wrapped. It's no problem for me, because if I need a new feature in my applications I just enhance the API. :-) But if you just like to concentrate on your application and never touch the library, then go with C API for now. The C API is really good and stable. But it's your decision! http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/EFLxx regards Andreas -- Technical Blog <http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
