On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:32:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:17:06 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> > said: > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:58:38 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:44:57 +1000 David Seikel > > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > > I can't answer all your questions, but I have some answers for > > > > you. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:15:33 -0200 Silas Silva > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I may try using ELF. > > > > > > > > It's EFL, Enlightenment Foundation Libraries, you got it right > > > > in the subject though. > > > > > > > > > 1. What exactly the fact the ELF is LGPL means for developing > > > > > proprietary applications? May I link it statically? (Oh, > > > > > after some time back in the development world, need to re-read > > > > > licenses...) > > > > > > > > Most of EFL is BSD licensed. Some parts are LGPL though. I > > > > think there is a mix of LGPL 2.1 and 3. > > > > > > we have lgpl 3 in core efl? c++ bindings are lgpl3. > > > > > > i guess epdf might be lgpl3 is you use the mupdf renderer. as > > > such for libraries we have released or now have beta's of they > > > are either bsd-2 clause or lgpl-2. > > > > I just did a grep. Looks like you are correct. > > > > Ethumbd is not really core, but it's LGPL 3. I knew one snuck in > > somewhere. > > it looks lgpl 2.1 to me - looking at COPYING in ethumb. i don't see > any copyright claim to the contract in ethumbd src... trunk/ethumb/src/bin/ethumbd.c has, starting on line 6 - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your * option) any later version. At least on my copy. Says version 3 to me, but my new glasses are one month overdue. > now is probably a good time to discuss licensing here. the above have > not come under the spotlight (yet) because they aren't core or > required. when they do... we'll have to figure this out. True. but probably better discussed on the dev mailing list. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
