The WALLET RRtype is already assigned as a DNS parameter https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/WALLET/wallet-completed-template
We are trying to get consensus on the operational usage of that RRtype. The TXT record fallback is also included as well as reverse lookup mechanisms. On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 6:20 AM Petr Menšík <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't we use URI instead? Maybe with prefix _wallet? Is introduction > of a new type necessary, when it seems like scheme:address format anyway? > > On 18/09/2024 17:44, Dave Lawrence wrote: > > Joe Abley writes: > >>> Would it be recommended to do a proposal that use either RRtype > >>> (TXT or WALLET) or choose one? > >> I haven't read your proposal and don't have an opinion on that. I > >> agree that it sounds like a good question for you to ask yourself. > > You don't have an opinion on using TXT? > > > > I'm somewhat surprised by this. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > -- > Petr Menšík > Software Engineer, RHEL > Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/ > PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
