The draft currently overloads the TXT record RRtype. WALLET record type would be appropriate but does have the issue that adoption isn't complete yet. Would it be recommended to do a proposal that use either RRtype (TXT or WALLET) or choose one?
Will reach out to Paul Hoffman as well. Thanks On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:28 AM Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 Sep 2024, at 08:51, Shay C <[email protected]> wrote: > > Forgive me, but I'm not clear if the WALLET RRtype is a proposal or if it > has been ratified. I see references to it in the IANA registry so I'm > assuming it has been assigned and is currently usable? > > > RRTypes are assigned by expert review and no specification is needed. > Here's the template that was used for WALLET: > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/WALLET/wallet-completed-template > > If your proposal requests a new RRType (I haven't read it, sorry), that > will also be subject to expert review and one of the things the expert will > consider is whether an existing RRType can be used instead. > > It is probably sensible to consider whether the existing WALLET RRType is > suitable for you to use. If so, your proposal could describe how that > existing RRType is used for your particular application. If not, be > prepared to show your working. > > I seem to remember Paul Hoffman was the one who applied for WALLET (and > somewhat recently) so it might be reasonable to get in touch with him and > compare notes. Paul is a frequent contributor to this working group and is > on this list. > > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
