Why don't we use URI instead? Maybe with prefix _wallet? Is introduction
of a new type necessary, when it seems like scheme:address format anyway?
On 18/09/2024 17:44, Dave Lawrence wrote:
Joe Abley writes:
Would it be recommended to do a proposal that use either RRtype
(TXT or WALLET) or choose one?
I haven't read your proposal and don't have an opinion on that. I
agree that it sounds like a good question for you to ask yourself.
You don't have an opinion on using TXT?
I'm somewhat surprised by this.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
