On 1/11/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a patch ready to commit that moves django.utils.httpwrappers > to django.http and updates all the dependencies and docs. I'd move > Http404 in another commit. Also, if we are going to rename the classes > in here, (as suggested by Kieran in the last email) I'd do that in a > sepatate commit as well. No one has commented on that though.
Let's hold off on renaming the classes for now (which ones, anyway -- the exceptions?). > I can't think of any reason to do django/http/__init__.py vs > django/http.py other than the former looks more like everything else > in django/. Adrian or Jacob, what's your preference, and should I go > ahead and commit it? Let's go with the http package, with an __init__.py in it, simply because it makes it more flexible to put stuff in there in the future. I'm excited to see the change! Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org