On 1/11/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a patch ready to commit that moves django.utils.httpwrappers
> to django.http and updates all the dependencies and docs. I'd move
> Http404 in another commit. Also, if we are going to rename the classes
> in here, (as suggested by Kieran in the last email) I'd do that in a
> sepatate commit as well. No one has commented on that though.

Let's hold off on renaming the classes for now (which ones, anyway --
the exceptions?).

> I can't think of any reason to do django/http/__init__.py vs
> django/http.py other than the former looks more like everything else
> in django/. Adrian or Jacob, what's your preference, and should I go
> ahead and commit it?

Let's go with the http package, with an __init__.py in it, simply
because it makes it more flexible to put stuff in there in the future.

I'm excited to see the change!

Adrian

--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org

Reply via email to