On 1/11/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/11/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a patch ready to commit that moves django.utils.httpwrappers
> > to django.http and updates all the dependencies and docs. I'd move
> > Http404 in another commit. Also, if we are going to rename the classes
> > in here, (as suggested by Kieran in the last email) I'd do that in a
> > sepatate commit as well. No one has commented on that though.
>
> Let's hold off on renaming the classes for now (which ones, anyway --
> the exceptions?).
>
> > I can't think of any reason to do django/http/__init__.py vs
> > django/http.py other than the former looks more like everything else
> > in django/. Adrian or Jacob, what's your preference, and should I go
> > ahead and commit it?
>
> Let's go with the http package, with an __init__.py in it, simply
> because it makes it more flexible to put stuff in there in the future.
>
> I'm excited to see the change!

It's finished. If we can get the other issues settled (mostly just
naming decisions, form or forms, template or templates) I can probably
get these all done (except shortcuts) before next monday.

Joseph

Reply via email to