On 1/12/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One thing, with all of changes, the django.db.models thing ends up being > > quite deep for such a core part. Thoughts? > > I think django.models sounds nice, although it would be confusing for > existing users (aside from the 5-ish people who are familiar with > magic-removal)
Let's keep it as django.db.models -- there's no telling whether we'll include another type of data-access layer in the future, such as an RDF backend, which would be equally deserving of the name "models". Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
