On 1/12/06, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current docs reflect the 0.91 release, which I think is where the > emphasis should lie. > Next to that we should have a copy of the 0.91 in a development > location for people tracking the development version. > > djangoproject.com/documentation/dev/ > djangoproject.com/documentation/svn/ > > are two that pop to my mind, dev is more version control agnostic. Opinions?
Here's how we're doing it currently: * Docs for 0.90 were frozen when 0.91 was released. They're available at http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/0_90/ . * The "standard" docs are for 0.91 *and* the development (SVN) version, and they're here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/ . Any feature that's changed in the development version is marked with "**New in Django development version.**" The reasoning behind using the same docs for the latest release (0.91) and SVN is that we make a *lot* of documentation improvements, and users of 0.91 should benefit from those -- i.e., the docs for 0.91 shouldn't be frozen. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
