On 25/10/15 13:05, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 10/25/2015 09:02 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On 25/10/15 10:22, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2015, 16:06:42 schrieb Matthew Toseland: >>>> We could even get rid of db4o if we can bundle it with the >>>> plugins that need it. >>> Let’s not do anything which could break plugins. >> Why not? Do any unofficial plugins use db4o? > We can't assume that they don't. I disagree. We should take reasonable steps to avoid breaking unofficial plugins, but we shouldn't let it cripple us. We are not Microsoft. And db4o is unmaintained upstream...
Of course, we should try to find out... and give plenty of notice.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
