On 29/10/15 08:38, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2015, 08:40:50 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: >>> I'm not sure I understand why you'd get a vote on what will happen. >> The part I’m talking about is the not-changing if not needed. > Also I don’t see why I have to get a vote to voice an opinion. > > - Who writes the guide for plugin authors on bundling db4o? > - Who ensures that the plugins will get updated? > - Who releases new versions of plugins which bundle db4o? > > Breakage like purge-db4o should not happen again. > > And in general, if you feel that only those who work on code get a > vote, then please broaden your view. There are a lot of people > creating value for Freenet without writing code. An answer like yours > essentially tells all of them that they are not wanted here. > > As long as Freenet has only around 10k people it can be technically > perfect all it wants without providing real freedom of speech — except > for the few people who never raised their opinions in public at all > (or rather: never even write in public). So what we need is adoption. > > And too little content along with guides which no longer work because > we changed something they described are at least as important for > adoption of Freenet as updating dependencies (or any other > medium-sized change). Not to forget all the people who work on > promoting Freenet. There are guides on how to use db4o in a Freenet plugin? I didn't think we had anywhere near that level of client author documentation!
What plugins currently use db4o? (Semi-)Official plugins: - WebOfTrust - Freetalk Unofficial plugins???
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
