On 23/10/15 07:54, dean wrote: > On 10/23/15 13:50, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> * I don't think v29 is preferable to contrib master. master is split >> into multiple jars, which is better and I'm hoping we can move to it. > My thoughts on this were: The debian package should use exactly the same > code as everybody else does. Isn't contrib master considered untested? I > planned to trial contrib master in branch until freenet used contrib > master too. Am I being silly? Should I just use master? I thought there were more recent changes on v29 than on master? There were a couple of important bugfixes, are they in master?
Also, do both versions of Contrib use Maven? >> * Does the wrapper not work with the packaged Debian version? In my >> experience it'll sometimes work despite a mismatch. > It appears to work. >> I don't know if that's unstable. > Me either, that's the problem. The wrapper warning scared me off: > WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version "3.3.1" while > the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is "3.5.26". The > Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may not function > correctly. This configuration has not been tested and is not supported. > This could still be a problem. > > It should be fairly trivial to update the wrapper freenet uses shouldn't > it? Maybe I'll look at this later, or when the build system gets upgraded. There should *not* be a wrapper mismatch. We should use the newer version of the wrapper for both the jar and the native binaries. In the released version we ship wrapper.jar *in addition to* freenet-ext.jar, and use wrapper.jar, and we don't get a version mismatch IIRC. Of course this means we have to update both the binary and the jar at the same time, which is the hard bit. >> * Why not depend on Bouncy Castle? I'd rather make a Debian package for >> 1.52 and use that. > Me too. The problem is in the making of the package. I'm subscribed to > the debian-java mail list and there has been mention of updating it, but > who knows when. I was trying to make this package usable right now and > depending on an old lib freenet will refuse to use is just a waste of > disk space. So eventually we need to submit a more recent version of bcprov to experimental - or host it ourselves (using a different name maybe).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
