Hi! > No. However, I am asking for proof.
Maybe I worked for the wrong companies all the time. But whenever we wanted to have proof that some tool or library actually meets our requirements, it never was sufficient to *ask* for proof. We needed to test it by *ourselfs* in a feasibility project. And normally *none* of the candidates completely met all of our requirements so we chose the tool with the least flaws, the best potential and (most important!) with the most dedicated maintenance/support crew. And of course some trust was part of the decision. Thiago, did this startegy of yours (simply asking for an all-inclusive proof and guarantee) ever work before? -- Regards Bernhard _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
