On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
> I'd like to point you to a mailing list message of Brad King from a
> few months ago about alternative languages for CMake [...]
> So, why not just go and propose the declarative QBS syntax as a
> front-end for CMake?
>
or, you know, just adding the remaining missing bits to qbs, which
doesn't have all the historical baggage of cmake? it's much easier to
make qbs generate (and even read) cmake interface files than to
re-architect cmake to make it, well, sane.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to