On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > I'd like to point you to a mailing list message of Brad King from a > few months ago about alternative languages for CMake [...] > So, why not just go and propose the declarative QBS syntax as a > front-end for CMake? > or, you know, just adding the remaining missing bits to qbs, which doesn't have all the historical baggage of cmake? it's much easier to make qbs generate (and even read) cmake interface files than to re-architect cmake to make it, well, sane. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- Re: [Development] Build s... NIkolai Marchenko
- Re: [Development] Build s... NIkolai Marchenko
- Re: [Development] Build s... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Build s... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build s... Bernhard Lindner
- Re: [Development] Build s... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6 Vlad Stelmahovsky
- Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6 Christian Gagneraud
- Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6 Christian Gagneraud
- Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6 Jean-Michaël Celerier
- Re: [Development] Build system for Qt ... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build system for... Matthew Woehlke
- Re: [Development] Build syste... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build s... Matthew Woehlke
- Re: [Development] Build s... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build s... Matthew Woehlke
- Re: [Development] Build s... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build s... Matthew Woehlke
- Re: [Development] Build s... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [Development] Build s... Matthew Woehlke
- Re: [Development] Build s... Oswald Buddenhagen