On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:53:48PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 12:29:46 PDT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > doesn't authorize you to impose requirements that make it basically > > impossible to employ qt as a bootstrapping device for a qbs > > ecosystem. > > The whole point was "let Qt not be the guinea pig". > you're essentially presuming that qbs is developed by a potentially incompetent external entity.
> Show me that the tool can achieve what Qt needs for it to achieve > qtbase//wip/qbs2 speaks for itself. > and has enough of a track record of a community to ask for help. > it has enough "community" and intrinsic quality to get things going. asking for more is completely unreasonable before the community from which the tool originates shows committment by *relying* on it. and as the current situation shows, everyone who didn't trust the story was *right*. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
