> But the fact that in 4 years there is just one package in Debian's archive using qbs says a lot.
Unfortunately all it says is that QBS developers _really_ didn't care to advertise/document their system. it's no wonder there are no projects when the only thing you have to work off of is a bunch module references. I am not so annoyed at the decision to drop qbs as I am annoyed at the fact that it failed because it never was given a fair chance and just as things seemed to begin to improve(i.e. finally tutorial pages) they decide to drop it. Of course now those pages become irrelevant as no one will want to jump onto a dying system regardless of if it has documentation or not. On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:32 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer < perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > El martes, 30 de octubre de 2018 15:26:14 -03 Иван Комиссаров escribió: > > Wow, hold on for a minute. > > I’ve been using a qbs package as a standalone leaf package (sudo aptitude > > install qbs) to build my projects. Also, self-built QBS package was > > commercially used to create several Debian packages back in 2013. > > I can't count what's not in Debian proper. But the fact that in 4 years > there > is just one package in Debian's archive using qbs says a lot. > > Of course anyone can jump in to help maintain qbs and keep it in the > archive. > > -- > http://www.tiraecol.net/modules/comic/comic.php?content_id=162 > > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
