On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 2:08 PM Martin Smith <martin.sm...@qt.io> wrote:
> No, it isn't a resolution. Not reacting to a complaint is no resolution. Given the (current) structure of the community I take that as the offence not carrying merit. But even if "the community" does react to the alleged offense, how is that > different from mob rule? > It is not. Note that having a committee doesn't exclude mob rule either. In all fairness, though, it makes it less likely, as I can easily imagine the people voted in are going to be of significant integrity. >Not only can I, I pretty much have to. > > No. You don't. You used the word "heinous." It has a meaning. You used it > deliberately to draw attention away from the problems the CoC is meant to > resolve. > I did no such thing, and I resent the accusation. I'm not defending the CoC text and premise. I'm defending the goal of > establishing a CoC. > Then I have no idea why we are arguing. I was just responding in good faith to a question that was put forth. From the very beginning of this thread I have operated under the assumption that a CoC is going to be adopted in some form or another. My turn to bite. What is a heinous act that is not a criminal act? > Personal attacks, baseless accusations, mean-spirited comments, a combination thereof. Anything that's beyond distasteful, but still doesn't constitute a crime.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
