I agree with you, Konstantin вс, 28 окт. 2018 г. в 13:36, Konstantin Shegunov <kshegu...@gmail.com>:
> > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:43 AM Martin Smith <martin.sm...@qt.io> wrote: > >> >Oh, it is going to end in A resolution, it may not end the way the >> offended party >> >may feel just, but that's true also for the proposed text. >> >> HA! You are not Konstantin Shegunov! A software engineer would imediately >> see that your 3 step CoC might not terminate. You are an imposter! >> > > That's actually amusing, but I'll bite. Formally speaking, I'm not a > software engineer, never had any formal training in the field. I'm a > physicist who moonlights as a programmer. In any case, the current status > quo, which is what I described, ends in either the community reacting or > not reacting to the alleged offence (i.e. isolating the offensive party for > example). That is A resolution, be it a good one or bad. > > >imagine that the abusive party is an employee of the QtC and has committed >> >heinous acts against a community member. >> >> You can't immediately jump to the worst case scenario to discredit the >> code of conduct. In fact, the CoC can deal with "heinous acts" by stating >> that such acts will be referred to the appropriate legal authority. >> > > Not only can I, I pretty much have to. Minor infringements can already be > handled internally without the need for CoC, major ones is where it would > actually matter if we have one and which one we chose. Also it's a > perfectly valid logic to push an argument to the extreme to see if holds, > we do it on every day basis. In math you can assume something, operate on > the presumption and see if contradicts itself when pushed (reductio ad > impossibilem). If I were to design a safety net for a nuclear power plant > am I to just ignore the extreme or unlikely case? Surely not. You compared > the CoC to a "local law" of sorts, but does the local law forgo the > unlikely case that from the whole population one person would be a > murderer? I shouldn't think so. > You can't defend the CoC's text and premise on the basis that my argument > is unlikely, or extreme. It has to able to withstand exactly those extremes! > > In fact, the CoC can deal with "heinous acts" by stating that such acts >> will be referred to the appropriate legal authority. > > > Not if they don't elevate to a criminal act. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
