On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:34:09AM +0200, Viktor Engelmann wrote: > On 13.10.2017 15:33, Christian Kandeler wrote: > >> Sure - but let's think about this in a different context: imagine > >> someone applies at your company. You invite them to a job interview > >> and have one of your engineers do a technical interview with them. > >> > >> Do you afterwards go to the applicant and ask them if they thought > >> your engineer was competent and fire your engineer if the applicant > >> says "no"? > > > This is an incredibly arrogant stance to take. No contributor is > > above others because of their employer. > > I said nothing that could reasonably be interpreted this way. > actually, you did, in your point 4, which this was indirectly referring to.
though i'll admit that i have a hard time figuring out how exactly your little "thought experiment" is supposed to support your point. but to answer it directly: yes, if trusted externals raised concerns about the qualifications of an internal, i'd wonder about our organization's judgment. > And I will not respond to personal insults. > being publicly criticized != being insulted. you should get used to that idea, given your propensity for making less-than-wise statements on this list. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
