Please, do not jump immediately to a conclusion. It was Viktor's proposal which does not represent "TQC administration" whatever it is. Qt-project has own rules and it is self-governmented. Just to be fair, you could also notice my answer to the proposal: > I do not agree. An employer name does not matter. and I do work for The Qt Company.
Cheers, Jędrek On piątek, 13 października 2017 14:51:13 CEST Alexander Nassian wrote: > That shows exactly the mindset of the TQC administration. Let the community > do the work and squeeze all customers and force them to use commercial > licensing by using fear... > > > Beste Grüße / Best regards, > Alexander Nassian > > > Am 13.10.2017 um 14:46 schrieb André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl>: > > > > Op 13/10/2017 om 13:04 schreef Viktor Engelmann: > >> 4. I don't think we need to be as paranoid towards contributions from our > >> own employees as we need to be towards external contributions.> > > So much for open government... > > > > André > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
