On 13.10.2017 14:22, André Hartmann wrote: > Hi Victor, > > just my 2 cent to one part: > >> 4. I don't think we need to be as paranoid towards contributions >> from > our own employees as we need to be towards external >> contributions. > Anyone with approver rights should be aware of his powers and use them > carefully, no matter if he is employed at The Qt Company or an > external contributor.
Sure - but let's think about this in a different context: imagine someone applies at your company. You invite them to a job interview and have one of your engineers do a technical interview with them. Do you afterwards go to the applicant and ask them if they thought your engineer was competent and fire your engineer if the applicant says "no"? > As it was stated on this mailing list some weeks ago: Only approve if > you can take the blame on breaking something. We shouldn't blame in the first place. We are all trying to make Qt better. I only wish I could spend more time doing actual WORK on Qt. > Best regards, > André -- Viktor Engelmann Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Rudower Chaussee 13 D-12489 Berlin viktor.engelm...@qt.io +49 151 26784521 http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B The Future is Written with Qt www.qtworldsummit.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
