oops - what I wanted to say about code of conduct: this is precisely why I opposed a code of conduct in the QtCS discussion. A code of conduct would pretty much lead to a situation where it doesn't matter if a message is understood correctly - the one who wrote it is to blame by default.
Some people will misuse such a "My response is always right" free-pass to silence every topic they don't like and (in the long run) that would lead to a situation where you will respond to mails/bugreports/... only with AutoText. On 16.10.2017 08:34, Viktor Engelmann wrote: > On 13.10.2017 15:33, Christian Kandeler wrote: >>> Sure - but let's think about this in a different context: imagine >>> someone applies at your company. You invite them to a job interview and >>> have one of your engineers do a technical interview with them. >>> >>> Do you afterwards go to the applicant and ask them if they thought your >>> engineer was competent and fire your engineer if the applicant says "no"? >> This is an incredibly arrogant stance to take. No contributor is above >> others because of their employer. > I said nothing that could reasonably be interpreted this way. > And I will not respond to personal insults. > -- Viktor Engelmann Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Rudower Chaussee 13 D-12489 Berlin viktor.engelm...@qt.io +49 151 26784521 http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B The Future is Written with Qt www.qtworldsummit.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
