Em sábado, 19 de novembro de 2016, às 19:57:57 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu: > You see, this is a perfect example of why we _don't_. > > (Some parts of) KF5 use boost and STL in the API (ever since KDE 4 or even > 3). It hasn't been a problem for KDE to keep BC guarantees comparable to > what Qt does. What makes you think that Qt would be any different?
Those parts of KDE don't keep BC guarantees. Distros have to rebuild everything when their dependencies change. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
