On Saturday 19 November 2016 14:18:20 Иван Комиссаров wrote: > Still, we need those guarantees not to rebuild whole KDE packages in linux > distros each time new Qt version (or new stdlib version if we’ll support > std:: in API) is released (also, users should reinstall those packages > too)
You see, this is a perfect example of why we _don't_. (Some parts of) KF5 use boost and STL in the API (ever since KDE 4 or even 3). It hasn't been a problem for KDE to keep BC guarantees comparable to what Qt does. What makes you think that Qt would be any different? Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
