Alexander Nassian wrote:
> Will there be now 10 BC discussions every year? At least it feels like.
> Why can't it be decided and then accepted by everyone as is? In my
> personal opinion I don't care much about BC but I'm happy that it blocks
> STL usage because its brutally unnatural and I stumbled so often over
> different behaviors of it on different platforms and compilers that I have
> a real hate on the STL.

I am glad that I am not alone with that feeling.

And by the way, with my distribution packager hat on, I have to frown upon 
the idea of dragging in yet another dependency just to enforce the C++ 
language inventor's personal, not uncontroversial stylistic preferences.

        Kevin Kofler

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to