On Saturday 19 November 2016 10:22:18 Иван Комиссаров wrote: > Maybe we should start another thread about BC? > I'm not convinced that MacOS is the only system when mixing libc++/stdlib > makes sence. On linux you can do the same.
As soon as someone explains to me what the material difference is between a) supporting mixing libc++ and libstdc++ on Unix platforms and b) supporting mixing release and debug runtimes on Windows, I'm open for discussing the merits of the former. Until then, I refuse to see a difference between the two, refuse to accept that we need to support one and not the other, and suggest to just compile two versions of Qt: libQt5*Foo-libc++.so and libQt5*Foo-libstdc++.so. If this solves the problem on Windows, someone needs to explain to me why it's not an option on Unix. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
