On 15 Feb 2013, at 11:43 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote: >> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback >> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals >> for them at that time as part of the process. > > I don't know why you're packaging those. > > You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right? > > And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will > likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be > part > of a Qt release?
Why does that mean Ubuntu packages are a bad idea? There are other unstable Linux libraries that people nevertheless make good use of. Ubuntu is moving towards using Wayland, right? And I think qtsystems might get some attention in the near term (but it may also get some API changes). _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
