There is one here, too: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47371
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jason McDonald <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Timo Jyrinki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>: > >>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be > >>> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently > >>> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker > >>> for distributing the modules. > > ... > >> I think it's ok. Let's just do it. > > Agreed. This was just an oversight of the modularization process. > > It shouldn't be very hard to make an autotest to check for the > existence of these files ine ach module, and to verify that the text > is in sync with the copies in qtbase. I'll add that my list of "rainy > day tasks". > > > Thanks. I did so for the core modules except qtwebkit which doesn't > > need anything more besides the LGPL license text already included. > > qtjsbackend also has only minimal amount of code under these. > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47235 (qtscript) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47236 (qtdeclarative) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47237 (qtsvg) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47238 (qtgraphicaleffects) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47239 (qtmultimedia) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47240 (qttools) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47241 (qtquick1) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47243 (qttranslations) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47244 (qtdoc) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47245 (qtimageformats) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47246 (qtactiveqt) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47247 (qtjsbackend) > > I've +2'd those changes, except qtactiveqt, which seems to need a copy > of the LICENSE.FDL. > > > The modules not part of official releases should also be updated at some > point. > > Do you have time to do that? If so, feel free to add me as a reviewer. > > -- > Jason > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
