2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>:
>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
>> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
>> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
>> for distributing the modules.
...
> I think it's ok. Let's just do it.

Thanks. I did so for the core modules except qtwebkit which doesn't
need anything more besides the LGPL license text already included.
qtjsbackend also has only minimal amount of code under these.

https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47235 (qtscript)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47236 (qtdeclarative)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47237 (qtsvg)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47238 (qtgraphicaleffects)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47239 (qtmultimedia)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47240 (qttools)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47241 (qtquick1)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47243 (qttranslations)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47244 (qtdoc)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47245 (qtimageformats)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47246 (qtactiveqt)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47247 (qtjsbackend)

The modules not part of official releases should also be updated at some point.

-Timo
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to