On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:46 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 1:58 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > My very quick review shows that this may all be present and then it is a >>> > matter >>> > of test cases and the compliance document. And that's a good result. >>> > Sometimes >>> > people do work and don't update tickets. >>> > >>> My hazy recollection is that someone looked into this. Maybe in prior >>> POSIX Compliance projects? >> >> >> Last year when I was porting ndbm.h I made several queries regarding this >> directory. >> Even after doing all the changes correctly, the port was not successful. >> Later I found >> out that the ndbm was calling a hash function from search.h. >> >> The headers in this directory need to be updated first. Me and Joel even had >> discussion about this in newlib mailing list but got no positive response >> from them. >> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2019/017046.html >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-June/026205.html > > > The newlib link doesn't work after the sourceware upgrade :( > > Let's assume this code needs to be updated to the latest freebsd and then > freebsd ndbm brought over.
Vaibhav, can you help Eshan to understand what you discovered last year, and work on a plan for this summer to address this challenge? >> >> >> --Vaibhav Gupta _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
