On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 1:58 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > My very quick review shows that this may all be present and then it is >> a matter >> > of test cases and the compliance document. And that's a good result. >> Sometimes >> > people do work and don't update tickets. >> > >> My hazy recollection is that someone looked into this. Maybe in prior >> POSIX Compliance projects? >> > > Last year when I was porting ndbm.h I made several queries regarding this > directory. > Even after doing all the changes correctly, the port was not successful. > Later I found > out that the ndbm was calling a hash function from search.h. > > The headers in this directory need to be updated first. Me and Joel even > had > discussion about this in newlib mailing list but got no positive response > from them. > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2019/017046.html > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-June/026205.html > The newlib link doesn't work after the sourceware upgrade :( Let's assume this code needs to be updated to the latest freebsd and then freebsd ndbm brought over. > > --Vaibhav Gupta >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
