On May 12, 2017 3:42 AM, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
On 12/05/2017 18:39, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 12/05/17 10:35, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >>> On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >> I talked to Joel late his time yesterday and he is reporting increased >> code size and as a result some tests are not fitting into the target. >> Rather than head on into the change we think it is better to step back >> and visit it again after we have a release. What do you think? >> > > A code size increase would be not an issue for me if its in the range of > a small percent range. However, we should identify this and create a GCC > PR. > > Gaisler suggested to use GCC 7.1. Did Gaisler observe some significant > code size changes on SPARC? > > Sorry I do not have any detail. I am sure Joel can provide some when he is online and has some time. I think all he did was build all the BSPs with tests and saw some new failures. 21 BSPs failed to link some.test due to a memory overflow. Mix or at least arm and 68k 4am here. I will post when i am really awake.b Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
