On 09/05/17 14:54, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2017-05-03 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/05/17 03:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There are no build failures for just the tests. Attached
is the warnings report which looks good if the networking warnings are
ignored.
I would rather use the GCC 6 which received some bug fix releases in
the mean time and was used most of the time of the RTEMS 4.12
development. For RTEMS 5 I would use GCC 8.
For the gaisler toolchain we are currently planning on using GCC 7.1.
If you tested this version thoroughly than this is fine for me. Did you
build all RTEMS targets which currently use GCC 6 with this version and
can you provide the RSB patches? If yes, then please use the versions
specified by GCC contrib/download_prerequisites for the support libraries.
A new GCC version probably means new warnings to fix.
We should manage the GCC selection better in the future. GCC 6 received
considerable more testing and regression fixes than GCC 7.1 which is
only two weeks old.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
