On 12/05/2017 18:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 12/05/17 10:35, Chris Johns wrote:
On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I talked to Joel late his time yesterday and he is reporting increased
code size and as a result some tests are not fitting into the target.
Rather than head on into the change we think it is better to step back
and visit it again after we have a release. What do you think?
A code size increase would be not an issue for me if its in the range of
a small percent range. However, we should identify this and create a GCC
PR.
Gaisler suggested to use GCC 7.1. Did Gaisler observe some significant
code size changes on SPARC?
Sorry I do not have any detail. I am sure Joel can provide some when he
is online and has some time.
I think all he did was build all the BSPs with tests and saw some new
failures.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel