On 2017-05-03 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/05/17 03:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There are no build failures for just the tests. Attached
is the warnings report which looks good if the networking warnings are
ignored.
I would rather use the GCC 6 which received some bug fix releases in
the mean time and was used most of the time of the RTEMS 4.12
development. For RTEMS 5 I would use GCC 8.
For the gaisler toolchain we are currently planning on using GCC 7.1.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
