On 4/05/2015 9:00 pm, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> On 4/05/2015 12:10 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@gwu.edu> wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Hesham ALMatary >>>> <heshamelmat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/05/2015 7:31 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >>>>>>> +%source set binutils >>>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-binutils-2.23-software-cache.zip >>>>>>> +%source set gcc >>>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/archive/epiphany-gcc-4.9.zip >>>>>>> +%source set gdb >>>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-gdb-7.8.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> Are these versions set or are they moving as the github repo moves ? >>>>>> >>>>> They are usually changing and modified, fixing bugs, add features, >>>>> etc. My pull requests got merged to these branches. That's why I think >>>>> hashes won't be practical. >>>>> >>>> Would it be better to pull the git repo itself to a certain commit >>>> then? >> >> From a commit id, sure. If you can pull a zip file from a specific >> commit id that would be better. >> > That's possible. > >> The reason we lock this down is to not changing anything on the user >> until it is known to be stable. There are ways using user macros to >> override the default and pick up the master branch for your testing so >> you can test using the master branch and users pick up the last know >> stable version. Contact me and I can explain if this is what you want. >> >>> For building tools we aim to have a reliable, reproducible tool >>>> set. Dealing with "moving targets" makes it harder to support. >>>> >>> That's possible. The problem is that the current RSB doesn't support >>> cloning from GitHub URLs like [1] or even [2]. [1] produce "malforned >>> URL (no protocol prefix)", and [2] assumes that it's a .tar file, and >>> doesn't even clone it. >>> >>> [1] g...@github.com:adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git >> >> Does git://g...@github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git work ? >> > Doesn't work.
Ok. >>> [2] https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git >> >> The doco in this section https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_http_https_and_ftp >> shows how to get a git version. Does this still work ? >> > The problem with cloning from github is that the URL should be > prefixed with "git://", and this is not the case for github repos. I > think download.py should be hacked to enable it. Yes I tend to agree. > Anyway, I'll submit a patch that downloads from specific commits. Thanks. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
