On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 4/05/2015 12:10 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@gwu.edu> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Hesham ALMatary >>> <heshamelmat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>>> On 1/05/2015 7:31 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >>>>>> +%source set binutils >>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-binutils-2.23-software-cache.zip >>>>>> +%source set gcc >>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/archive/epiphany-gcc-4.9.zip >>>>>> +%source set gdb >>>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-gdb-7.8.zip >>>>> >>>>> Are these versions set or are they moving as the github repo moves ? >>>>> >>>> They are usually changing and modified, fixing bugs, add features, >>>> etc. My pull requests got merged to these branches. That's why I think >>>> hashes won't be practical. >>>> >>> Would it be better to pull the git repo itself to a certain commit >>> then? > > From a commit id, sure. If you can pull a zip file from a specific > commit id that would be better. > That's possible.
> The reason we lock this down is to not changing anything on the user > until it is known to be stable. There are ways using user macros to > override the default and pick up the master branch for your testing so > you can test using the master branch and users pick up the last know > stable version. Contact me and I can explain if this is what you want. > >> For building tools we aim to have a reliable, reproducible tool >>> set. Dealing with "moving targets" makes it harder to support. >>> >> That's possible. The problem is that the current RSB doesn't support >> cloning from GitHub URLs like [1] or even [2]. [1] produce "malforned >> URL (no protocol prefix)", and [2] assumes that it's a .tar file, and >> doesn't even clone it. >> >> [1] g...@github.com:adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git > > Does git://g...@github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git work ? > Doesn't work. >> [2] https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git > > The doco in this section https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_http_https_and_ftp > shows how to get a git version. Does this still work ? > The problem with cloning from github is that the URL should be prefixed with "git://", and this is not the case for github repos. I think download.py should be hacked to enable it. Anyway, I'll submit a patch that downloads from specific commits. > Chris -- Hesham _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
