On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 1/05/2015 7:31 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >> +%source set binutils >> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-binutils-2.23-software-cache.zip >> +%source set gcc >> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/archive/epiphany-gcc-4.9.zip >> +%source set gdb >> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-gdb-7.8.zip > > Are these versions set or are they moving as the github repo moves ? > They are usually changing and modified, fixing bugs, add features, etc. My pull requests got merged to these branches. That's why I think hashes won't be practical.
About the error you got, I tested the patch and it's building fine on my Fedora OS. I'll have to clone another vanilla RSB repo, apply the patch, and test again. > The reason I ask is no hashes are included and a warning is being generated. > > Chris -- Hesham _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
