On 4/05/2015 12:10 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@gwu.edu> wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Hesham ALMatary >> <heshamelmat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>> On 1/05/2015 7:31 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >>>>> +%source set binutils >>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-binutils-2.23-software-cache.zip >>>>> +%source set gcc >>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/archive/epiphany-gcc-4.9.zip >>>>> +%source set gdb >>>>> https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-gdb-7.8.zip >>>> >>>> Are these versions set or are they moving as the github repo moves ? >>>> >>> They are usually changing and modified, fixing bugs, add features, >>> etc. My pull requests got merged to these branches. That's why I think >>> hashes won't be practical. >>> >> Would it be better to pull the git repo itself to a certain commit >> then?
>From a commit id, sure. If you can pull a zip file from a specific commit id that would be better. The reason we lock this down is to not changing anything on the user until it is known to be stable. There are ways using user macros to override the default and pick up the master branch for your testing so you can test using the master branch and users pick up the last know stable version. Contact me and I can explain if this is what you want. > For building tools we aim to have a reliable, reproducible tool >> set. Dealing with "moving targets" makes it harder to support. >> > That's possible. The problem is that the current RSB doesn't support > cloning from GitHub URLs like [1] or even [2]. [1] produce "malforned > URL (no protocol prefix)", and [2] assumes that it's a .tar file, and > doesn't even clone it. > > [1] g...@github.com:adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git Does git://g...@github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git work ? > [2] https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb.git The doco in this section https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_http_https_and_ftp shows how to get a git version. Does this still work ? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
