On 2014-07-07 09:46, Daniel Cederman wrote:
Probably true. I could change
rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_instruction_cpu_set(set) to
rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_instruction_all_processors() instead. Or make the
original rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_instruction() notify all processors when
running SMP, but I guess that could be dangerous.

I would simply keep this rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_instruction() and add not additional function. What can be dangerous here? This SMP cache message stuff should be optional in the cache manager implementation (e.g. similar to CPU_CACHE_SUPPORT_PROVIDES_RANGE_FUNCTIONS) since on decent SMP processors the hardware will ensure this automatically.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to